not that you have time for leisure reading or anything, but I’d like to know what you think about Enn’s theology- either we’re both heretics or Westminster has gone mad.
Everyone quotes Bavink at some time. As for my thoughts on Enns, I really don’t have any. I haven’t read the book or really followed the controversy. The only thing I’ve really read is John Frame’s review. I read Frame because after reading his “Doctrine of the Knowledge of God” I really sensed that he tries to be balanced and not quick to judge when there is someone he might disagree with. I found his comments to be helpful as he both critiques yet does so in a humble way (http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/2008Enns.htm).
hah, I was reading an article by Peter Enns (recent professor who was kicked out of Westminister) who quoted Bavink.
http://peterennsonline.com/ii/authority-of-scripture/
not that you have time for leisure reading or anything, but I’d like to know what you think about Enn’s theology- either we’re both heretics or Westminster has gone mad.
Everyone quotes Bavink at some time. As for my thoughts on Enns, I really don’t have any. I haven’t read the book or really followed the controversy. The only thing I’ve really read is John Frame’s review. I read Frame because after reading his “Doctrine of the Knowledge of God” I really sensed that he tries to be balanced and not quick to judge when there is someone he might disagree with. I found his comments to be helpful as he both critiques yet does so in a humble way (http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/2008Enns.htm).