<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Updates for 2008-08-12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedailyburns.com/twitter-updates-for-2008-08-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedailyburns.com/twitter-updates-for-2008-08-12/</link>
	<description>Ryan, Jenn, Asher, Grace, and Calvin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Burns</title>
		<link>http://thedailyburns.com/twitter-updates-for-2008-08-12/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyburns.com/twitter-updates-for-2008-08-12/#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Everyone quotes Bavink at some time.  As for my thoughts on Enns, I really don&#039;t have any. I haven&#039;t read the book or really followed the controversy.  The only thing I&#039;ve really read is John Frame&#039;s review.  I read Frame because after reading his &quot;Doctrine of the Knowledge of God&quot; I really sensed that he tries to be balanced and not quick to judge when there is someone he might disagree with.  I found his comments to be helpful as he both critiques yet does so in a humble way (http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/2008Enns.htm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone quotes Bavink at some time.  As for my thoughts on Enns, I really don&#8217;t have any. I haven&#8217;t read the book or really followed the controversy.  The only thing I&#8217;ve really read is John Frame&#8217;s review.  I read Frame because after reading his &#8220;Doctrine of the Knowledge of God&#8221; I really sensed that he tries to be balanced and not quick to judge when there is someone he might disagree with.  I found his comments to be helpful as he both critiques yet does so in a humble way (<a href="http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/2008Enns.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/2008Enns.htm</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica Marusek</title>
		<link>http://thedailyburns.com/twitter-updates-for-2008-08-12/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica Marusek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyburns.com/twitter-updates-for-2008-08-12/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>hah, I was reading an article by Peter Enns (recent professor who was kicked out of Westminister) who quoted Bavink.

http://peterennsonline.com/ii/authority-of-scripture/

not that you have time for leisure reading or anything, but I&#039;d like to know what you think about Enn&#039;s theology- either we&#039;re both heretics or Westminster has gone mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hah, I was reading an article by Peter Enns (recent professor who was kicked out of Westminister) who quoted Bavink.</p>
<p><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/ii/authority-of-scripture/" rel="nofollow">http://peterennsonline.com/ii/authority-of-scripture/</a></p>
<p>not that you have time for leisure reading or anything, but I&#8217;d like to know what you think about Enn&#8217;s theology- either we&#8217;re both heretics or Westminster has gone mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

