What did you read today?

Me? This:

A Commentary on Micah

In wesapat (and he will judge), the waw is a consequential relative; the qal third masculine singular, like the third masculine singular suffixes in 4:2, has “I am” as the antecedent (see 4:2) of the root spt (See 3:1,8,9). Syr takes tora as the subject, perhaps to avoid anthropomorphism, but Tg, which has a more pronounced tendency in this direction, clearly reads ydyn

A Commentary on Micah – by Bruce Waltke (Particularly, this is the start of his exegesis of Micah 4:3)

One thought on “What did you read today?